tudor poor man's rolex reddit | About the poor man's Rolex tudor poor man's rolex reddit Reddit's go-to source for news and discussion about Rolex and Tudor watches. Do Rolex owners see Tudor as poor man’s rolex? I know it’s topic that is discussed a lot, it’s debatable and there . Snorkeling, Parasailing, SNUBA Dive, and Sunset Cruises in Islamorada. Making memories since 1994. see our offerings. book a tour. . 77522 Overseas Hwy Islamorada, FL 33036 +1 (305)743-0145 ;
[email protected]; Snorkeling Sunset Cruise Parasailing Corporate & Private Charter. About Us FAQ
0 · [Tudor] When they say Tudor is still a “poor man’s Rolex”:
1 · Tudor: The poor man's Rolex?
2 · Tudor the poor man’s Rolex. Not in my book
3 · Thoughts on Tudor? : r/rolex
4 · Response to “Tudor is the poor man’s Rolex”
5 · Is Tudor considered a poor's man Rolex?
6 · Got my first poor man’s Rolex at 24, couldn’t be happier
7 · Do Rolex owners see Tudor as poor man’s rolex?
8 · About the poor man's Rolex
$15.00
The key stereotype "poor man's Rolex" is mainly spread around by Rolex owners. Brand snobbery at it's finest. Tudor's innovation doesn't attract the average Rolex owner, neither .I like both equally but I’ve often heard the phrase “Tudor is the poor man’s Rolex” .Reddit's go-to source for news and discussion about Rolex and Tudor .I like both equally but I’ve often heard the phrase “Tudor is the poor man’s Rolex” from people, especially those who are super-fans of Omega. How would you respond to this statement?
Reddit's go-to source for news and discussion about Rolex and Tudor watches. Do Rolex owners see Tudor as poor man’s rolex? I know it’s topic that is discussed a lot, it’s debatable and there .
Back when a Rolex Sub was ,000 in todays dollars brand new, and a Tudor was far less, one might say a Tudor was a poor man’s Rolex, but both of those brands have gone .
Tudor the poor man’s Rolex. Not in my book - Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum User Name
![[Tudor] When they say Tudor is still a “poor man’s Rolex”:](/upluds/images/[Tudor] When they say Tudor is still a “poor man’s Rolex”: .jpg)
If Hans Wilsdorf himself said that the Tudor brand is supposed to give you "Rolex dependability" at a lower price point, then you can't blame people for calling Tudor watches the .Every afternoon I admire its bezel while eating my PB & J sandwich. Every night I look at it on the way home from the office, weary eyes still managing to take in all that Pepsi goodness. Some .
Tudor is neither the poor mans Rolex nor is it the wise mans Rolex. Eventhough it is obvious, they share DNA. Just the same as every brand in the Swatch group shares some .Got my first poor man’s Rolex at 24, couldn’t be happier. 93 votes, 96 comments. 45K subscribers in the Tudor community. A place to discuss Tudor brand watches!
85 votes, 272 comments. As Rolex fans, what are your thoughts on Tudor? Do you appreciate them, or do you view them still as a “poor man’s Rolex”?..
Definitely wouldn’t say they are a poor man’s Daytona. Tudor as a brand have progressed since the early days . 😂 GrandSeiko doesn’t count those are actually luxury watches But yes Tudor was literally created to make a “poor man’s Rolex” But it’s a nice looking watch . Still ,500-7,500 watch brand . Welcome to reddit .I have a Tudor Royal since 1962,has been worn every day for 60 years,serviced by various watch repair Co’s–however,when I needed a new bracelet,Rolex refused to supply the Rolex original logo bracelet that was wornout,but instead insisted only a Tudor could be provided.I believe that oyster clasp was valuable by it’s design-but I traded it in-now,I think the watch is worth less .That's slowly changing as it seems like Hans Wilsdorf foundation is making an advertisement push with the Tudor brand as of late. Probably also due to their plan to eventually move the entire Tudor catalogue to METAS certified movements to squeeze competitors (mainly Omega) from both sizes of the price ranges with Tudor and Rolex.
Prestige: Tudor might be considered as a “Poor mans Rolex” by non-watch enthusiasts. Value: Tudor hands down (If you buy retail). Market price for most Omega models is significantly lesser than retail. Like the aqua-terra line is priced relative to the Rolex OP line but in the grey market, you can find them priced more closely to the BB-58. 1) no poor man is buying a k watch. 2) the price difference between a gold sub and a stainless sub is far greater than a stainless sub and a Tudor Black Bay 58. Back when a Rolex Sub was ,000 in todays dollars brand new, and a Tudor was far less, one might say a Tudor was a poor man’s Rolex, but both of those brands have gone way upmarket.Agree with others; definitely not a poor man’s collection- more like a “not well off enough to have a GMT and a Daytona with the Sub” post, but that’s ok imo, and I’d actually swap out the Tudor BB Chrono for a Speedmaster 1861 and the Tudor GMT with a Grand Seiko Spring Drive; I love Tudor, especially my Black Bay Pro, but they’re not replacements for Rolex.
Reddit's go-to source for news and discussion about Rolex and Tudor watches. Members Online Lawless London: Shocking moment watch robbers tackle husband and wife and steal his £28K black and gold Rolex Yacht Master in brutal attack - as police launch manhuntPoor mans Rolex? My new ZF Tudor Blackbay Harrods edition. . they offer custom order and do not have a website. I don’t think they are trusted dealers on reddit at the minute but are widely used and trusted on the forum. . Except a Harrods black bay will cost you almost if not as much as a 5 digit no date sub so not really the poor man's.Even though I’m not interested in the money side of watch collection this was a worthy read I think with what drove the Rolex market (flex and quick buck among others) the perception of Tudor as a poor man’s Rolex would hurt it especially in the flex culture that is huge in the cultureWith this attitude and mindset I could say to you that Rolex is poor man’s watch brand, compared to Patek Philip or vacheron. Tudor is NOT poor man Rolex. Period. They make their own movements and their design is based on their historic pieces. So basically shut the f up ️.. also, calling a 4K watch a poor man’s watch is totally .
Who ever calls a Tudor "poor man's Rolex" has never ever seen a Tudor oder Rolex in real life. Reply reply More replies. . Reddit's go-to source for news and discussion about Rolex and Tudor watches. Members Online. Explorer on a nato. Thoughts?Tudor being described as “the poor man’s rolex” shouldn’t be thought of as insult. It’s a fact and it’s one of the things that makes Tudor appealing imo. It means you’re getting a watch that is readily available for the most part, yet has the history and quality (albeit to a lesser degree) of a Rolex, for a fraction of the price. Tudor is neither the poor mans Rolex nor is it the wise mans Rolex. Eventhough it is obvious, they share DNA. Just the same as every brand in the Swatch group shares some DNA. But a Tudor, isn't a Rolex, just like a Certina isn't an Omega. As long as the watch keeps time and date or does it's functions then it works as intended.Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Or check it out in the app stores . [Tudor] Poor Man's President | 7019/3 Jumbo Day Date Share Sort by: Best. Open comment sort options. Best. Top. New. Controversial. Old. Q&A. .
Tudor: The Poor Man’s Rolex or a Respected Watch Brand? By Thomas Hendricks. In 1946, Rolex’s founder Hans Wilsdorf wanted to make a more accessible version of the crown brand and, thus, Tudor was born. Today, Tudor has earned a devoted following of its own and is .But isn’t Rolex direct competitor to Omega. If this is true, Tudor is out of the hierarchy rank as Tudor is known to be sister to Rolex or the poor man’s Rolex. These type of statement generally affixed perception that Tudor is under Rolex.
The poor man’s Rolex comments stem from pre 2012 Tudor. Tudor was literally created as a ‘poor man’s Rolex’ by Hans Wilsdorf in the 1920’s. Tudor’s used to be a Rolex watch, with an off the shelf movement as opposed to the in-house that Rolex used. I.e, the Tudor Submariner.
Reddit's go-to source for news and discussion about Rolex and Tudor watches. Members Online ADMIN MOD • Do Rolex owners see Tudor as poor man’s rolex?Had the 58, sold it to buy a 14060, and don’t regret it one bit. I loved the 58, great proportions and good design. But, it’s still not a Rolex. I think it’s disingenuous to call Tudor the poor man’s Rolex, as a brand it can certainly stand on its own. But, it’s still not Rolex. The 58 just couldn’t scratch the itch quite like the .I don't agree with the view that Tudor is a poor man's Rolex. Yes, they tend to be cheaper, but realistically speaking anyone who can afford to splash on a -4k Tudor can afford a -6k Rolex. Tudor as a brand has deviated much from when it was simply an outlet for Rolex parts, they have their own designs, movements and brand now.Nowadays both brands have eolved on their own. Rolex is a lot more expensive and so is Tudor. TUDOR no longer builds same designs with third party movements. Tudor has their own designs and in house movements but atill carries some of that rolex heritage. Tudor is way more affordable watch. But no poor man is buying a 4k watch lol.
Quality bracelet (You won’t notice the faux rivets, I promise), but getting a perfect fit might be a problem for some. 200m water resistance. COSC-certified movement. Love the Tudor Rose on the screw-down crown. This is not a “poor man’s Rolex”; this is a purely crafted and reliable watch from Tudor. Looking forward to many years with this.209K subscribers in the rolex community. Reddit's go-to source for news and discussion about Rolex and Tudor watches.Tudor vs Rolex: uncover the unique heritage, design excellence, and technological innovations that set these iconic watch brands apart. . Tudor was founded in 1926 by Hans Wilsdorf, the man that brought us Rolex, which was initially established under the name Wilsdorf & Davis in 1905. . Now, rather than being seen as the poor man’s Rolex .
Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now . For years I’ve seen people in the watch community say that Tudor is the poor man’s Rolex and omega is a tier above Tudor But lately I’ve been seeing people say Tudor is the rich man’s omega. What changed? Why doesn’t the bb58 have a ceramic bezel? Aluminum for 4k seems .View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. The poor man's Day Date. I finally got my first nice watch, the Tudor Royal 41 in blue. Looks and feels outstanding, and I haven't seen a ton posted here. Movement is beautiful and quality is outstanding, couldn't be happier with it! . Stop calling Tudor a poor man's Rolex .
Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Or check it out in the app stores . they’ve done so well moving away from the “poor man’s Rolex” label. Sadly there are a lot of Tudor “fans” who genuinely are just poor men who wish they could afford a submariner, hence all this wishful thinking and “rumours .
rolex usati datejust 1981
$1,790.00
tudor poor man's rolex reddit|About the poor man's Rolex
